↓ Skip to main content

European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery

Article Metrics

Warden procedure for correction of sinus venosus atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection

Overview of attention for article published in Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 video uploader
Title
Warden procedure for correction of sinus venosus atrial septal defect and partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection
Published in
Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
DOI 10.1510/mmcts.2016.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Hofmann, Hitendu H. Dave, Martin O. Schmiady, Michael Hübler

Abstract

A superior sinus venosus defect is a congenital cardiac disease which is commonly associated with partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection. Here we present the Warden procedure - our preferred technique for repair. Our goal is to highlight the principles of repair with a focus on critical aspects of the surgical technique.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,081,491
of 8,183,022 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#85
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,106
of 129,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Manual of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,183,022 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them